返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 . `6 {. [# m# f- m3 s( C% P5 E% i8 T
& k& m( }4 W6 _: @- Y
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE$ [0 G( P0 K, u/ H3 j: Z- P
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended" X& P) e4 S8 c6 k9 n2 {
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
" R% n& A5 `) H  {( l4 ]; _( Hinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
/ V& Z: R$ b8 O( ~: sGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but8 X5 ]& q2 i' t! w
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will: V& o: d* I8 g' x' m7 @
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
  u; R4 G- @' j( z% yand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when$ Y5 P- B: b! ?' o! ]! a
planning operations that require such high risk.6 ~! W% }' @/ |5 A# b+ ?
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
& _8 g( P2 q% w- R% ~* G: ?, G7 |0 r" U8 E6 ?0 f
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理/ `9 i# C/ d( e5 m' r
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表