返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 9 }" q4 V3 T2 K4 Q; A

( z- J( F- Y$ ~4 }: y: x% x7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE; Y. W& l% a% I
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
3 i9 A! j% _5 D9 S! a/ j6 krange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with/ o- p2 ^( G& \8 S, g3 p
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of" t9 T. s2 v; @. G7 O4 i
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
9 y7 L4 p( R8 @& ocould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
0 I- S( V4 [7 w0 @8 Bsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal- F2 p1 [! ?! M8 T6 J; `
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
/ V: w( s  @# H1 ~planning operations that require such high risk.7 I# I: @. X3 n6 P+ n) H
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
1 L/ q; v% A' Q1 B' p( ^) T4 P
* J2 Y1 e# L% ~, i中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理) T3 R* U; Y; F5 m2 d
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表