返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 1 S  f7 [; x6 P0 q, [
! s0 e; Q& e& H  N
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
5 v$ p6 ]' I/ L/ F7 E- X0 ~The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended: b  O. x# o" P- P4 N6 y
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with% ~) y" O' h: |" H
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
7 A7 i2 {8 x. w! G8 L9 sGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
1 ]! c" [0 d3 r: T/ I/ gcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
7 F- _5 c5 c7 s7 Bsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
0 E# I) t$ v# V& b9 t- M5 f: Oand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
% L( s8 \+ \' f; X- x% u6 }planning operations that require such high risk.
3 t) U8 O1 J0 d5 S& x谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 " T; J9 G; W; t5 G/ K/ C# e7 W7 u
' r5 M4 X( P: p  G! Y
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
! L5 C+ x" P" `# x1 F8 ]扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表