返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 # F+ s1 A- j) I% i" m
) H& J0 z* W) G2 Z: P  r
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE4 ~, V: \0 _6 n1 Q
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
: [$ A5 t* d$ F; K( w; }7 erange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
/ e9 R% X! k% f# p* j* L, |instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
3 E9 [6 M% X7 F0 T5 M5 K  ]3 |/ [. d0 tGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but( O9 H, n7 O5 \7 Z; U/ X
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
( ]+ \8 }) z( J, Gsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal, `) i& n8 L: I) E  m" M8 b% p0 V4 B
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when4 Q- \/ `& C$ L7 s/ c$ n
planning operations that require such high risk.
# n& y" k1 o+ O谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 9 `; u2 W+ [: T( _
) N4 ?5 ^! @) w* q
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理8 E+ U2 Y3 j& }$ U8 ^; M
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表