返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43 3 Y, C/ N. c# e2 f: m
. ]! S" U2 F% q. j
Japanese aircraft ; I0 R2 N, [) l
Ki-100 Tony x 36
! h" f7 K" y" r3 u# w$ Z, W' m$ G) H0 z: z4 j" b* w# h
Allied aircraft
# B. l4 w5 h9 S! y5 KB-29 Superfortress x 33
/ o) a1 x% h3 o8 d" {3 n
5 P& L8 y1 M! }3 ~1 c( `Japanese aircraft losses 4 ]4 g1 X% m6 C* H9 Z6 H( `
Ki-100 Tony: 12 damaged
7 [" x8 a8 @4 k/ n! m$ A- T( F( H5 k& ?- v3 V7 `7 E
Allied aircraft losses
& v) w1 G+ l# [6 _$ |/ hB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed
5 {- e. p* l$ d, x& y8 i* J' U6 N
Japanese ground losses: % M3 I1 {9 W. [/ N
34 casualties reported
& D( Y1 @7 W: q: ]# i$ q. ^* o8 LGuns lost 1
* T6 Q$ b$ g8 m8 T, V9 Y4 F6 Z) V( q& }1 ~$ K# G+ ?
Airbase hits 5
# r2 Q& X  ?+ A2 l6 ?+ M' Y* @Airbase supply hits 2
. s9 C& D9 p7 b- K+ [6 g# WRunway hits 13 " U) W% x. N. Z- e

* y, P( G/ J$ Z7 y5 }8 k8 l1 f4 C, j9 [0 y8 n( L' Q+ x* T
原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。
, p$ u4 M% v/ g
& b; @- \( ~4 k/ {8 Z0 z% ]2 a从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。+ F$ }, E6 y8 z

; V! t, ^0 m! Y- u( t6 A* F
. [, \0 A  X1 ?. ^. f9 x' m, j8 S; NOur fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25! ' e9 r2 ^# r& y% [( J
Can't keep this up for long * ?- O1 r, Y) |' C- h
2 ^* S( l2 i2 h9 X
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51 : p: i, p6 v  ?1 g% |- t9 v

! t( _& g! u$ T, c  j+ M+ e3 q2 A* vJapanese aircraft 9 i$ e" Q! S& H/ u/ [; f
A6M5 Zeke x 20
% I7 ~. Y; X/ ~+ E. r* dKi-84-Ic Frank x 24
$ V% h. @& P+ w/ H2 ?$ W7 y( `) K
Allied aircraft
1 _+ \) F8 G3 z+ UB-29 Superfortress x 260
( [8 @4 f6 ?* G$ S% v9 [
, X' M2 J, q3 k% P. qJapanese aircraft losses
6 x; C7 d# X. H4 i/ p" _A6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged 9 w1 [9 j# ^9 @3 u: t% u* ?# u
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged
  N9 D7 F1 v$ r. K' o! {
: G* R. t( M6 |Allied aircraft losses
& R4 ^8 n2 m- Q, e. \9 z6 _B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged
' I- i; |$ m8 g1 N- @4 i
, |. s6 k# ~, P3 n; u6 D" R: ?. @Japanese ground losses: 1 X4 x" d/ S1 U4 h9 R1 s& G: I
204 casualties reported   W- S( I" I8 N7 v" g, w
Guns lost 5
! [1 H6 g/ I  A2 c) p0 U$ n3 i0 S4 J; r. j
Airbase hits 66 : s8 b. e  z# S* z7 S8 e% l4 |  X
Airbase supply hits 5 $ q+ D' c. S- [" d# d
Runway hits 364
# }; i2 v: z6 D ( T. q* H) V7 p9 P2 h: v
2 X& ?6 j& N' u- n6 l1 O
这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。
* T; H0 A3 \" ^' {
# e! t4 _4 f8 Z+ O3 dDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
* e5 [) E1 k6 ]3 |4 D$ L* R5 m: L$ B
& Q4 F# L8 ]0 S6 [2 qJapanese aircraft
, n' y2 t( x2 M' R* ?A6M5 Zeke x 4 5 T/ B' L0 M3 p0 f  H; v
N1K1-J George x 33 ' X# Q, D6 M9 G. g4 {
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5 - S: E0 t* d" l. g$ H" n* L! [
Ki-100 Tony x 18 # a; D: v0 t4 x; p0 ^
! y5 x% j7 l; A- ]  @9 T
Allied aircraft + M' g: `4 {  e. s1 s
B-29 Superfortress x 155 * d7 y2 k  q1 `' |: l
' y6 |$ M3 X, k/ {, V* y$ {7 w
Japanese aircraft losses
/ G4 O; L; b0 `3 iA6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed 0 a5 w3 D/ ~3 ]. [6 _* S
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged . T1 R- m3 u5 c! v( n
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
* E, h1 z" n& w- z& m) P! `, ]+ LKi-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
/ X: C+ S& ~* _- D$ y8 Y2 s, E! gH6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed
" Q- n0 c2 s6 P2 _Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed
+ q4 z! [. `, {$ m# `# @Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed
; Z1 N, a/ g2 a7 l1 Q3 v2 G. k8 ?: U0 V: ^
Allied aircraft losses
0 V0 ?4 V" F  y7 h* f9 _7 kB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged4 p- Y! y6 X/ Z& L+ |1 g/ v

- I( [: F6 h* t/ O[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。
& q& ^, q5 g2 o1 `6 G8 y7 O# B* h4 W6 t
Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
- `% t+ z3 p3 B3 Q0 ^5 q& F9 I! j( `
0 `/ K3 y8 z  {9 G  I0 d& WJapanese aircraft   a( i/ d; L9 S/ H! V9 O/ `' M6 P
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31 ! }* B# I# B& U1 b1 T
, x4 N9 F, E! V
Allied aircraft
: Y: X, ^8 z2 U4 u, S' G' LB-29 Superfortress x 12
4 q5 M1 M& K/ \" o6 q: a0 {+ k! r4 v( z1 S4 R! Y1 Q8 \. K- V
海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。) ]( h5 n& L1 n- P5 ~

* c; f9 Z) J7 ?3 F% o/ \2 @8 GDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 2 U% G: O/ `; d5 g' S% c
8 p; w* E5 l2 n* L
Japanese aircraft ; p* G* [. x3 |. z8 L6 q! A8 p4 S
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22
1 b2 w3 X/ c/ ?2 g- ^3 ^Ki-100 Tony x 15 + r+ [# n& \+ X5 C9 v4 L) k' s* q
Ki-102a Randy x 13
4 v7 H6 q+ U+ I/ M6 {3 `' l9 Z9 h5 A" N3 e: A9 l: H3 J
Allied aircraft
% s5 g+ r2 q3 }: r) r3 eF4U-1D Corsair x 20 8 K+ Z) ^0 t$ l5 k% r
( x9 O( g( j, W4 k
Japanese aircraft losses , q5 S; j+ u2 ^' a9 G( c5 l
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged / i( g; S4 J, a1 H6 `7 R
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed / u% a) O: ~# w* Q# M
Ki-102a Randy: 2 destroyed + `3 N, s7 X$ Y8 }5 `0 N9 s! W

( j. |' O2 x6 A" f: zAllied aircraft losses
0 R! h3 [2 @0 J: d4 kF4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
- S. r" g, k8 T$ l6 w' N7 |. ~0 Q- c2 A! x

$ t5 `" s% {4 k0 [Japanese aircraft losses : t- p. j& d0 u
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged
8 }# _3 L8 L9 L/ d1 @' z
/ G' n& X* n/ d' \& Q3 a3 DAllied aircraft losses 9 a* {6 W! o* k
B-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………1 L9 S! ~6 T' {8 ^- ?9 [$ z: r

' y  s; B3 T* K7 d虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………3 X, ?1 }8 W; {9 e+ k

" S7 v, e" U9 s1 G8 TDay Air attack on TF at 52,52
" F5 O4 r0 R+ s& B# ~! a, I% e' x, s4 S
Japanese aircraft 1 n- H0 N, o( r6 ^% p9 {5 F
A6M5 Zeke x 32
( H' j6 o* h2 a' pKi-43-IIa Oscar x 2
7 Z: c  U- |2 M0 E4 }8 f+ g/ G1 i3 F9 K' X
Japanese aircraft losses
! `; I8 \- s) Y6 JA6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
$ T% p4 P. w. M) B1 ?  ]  x
# y, Y) }3 q5 k2 P& F4 sAllied Ships 6 c7 j5 [+ e' z
APD John P. Gray
0 q4 }0 V9 J0 o/ D; f$ QAPD Ray K. Edwards
5 Y( }; D, l: CAK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1
- \' T" S& f) V8 Z& V+ BDE Day ; B3 i2 v4 I$ ^
% a& H' c% a2 t. T
Allied ground losses: 1 b9 Z* I" D) u  U9 J
51 casualties reported
- O& [+ T/ s5 m! R' \, V6 {1 L) O7 mGuns lost 2
8 C. F2 L  B& g  E. M9 ~4 J9 ZVehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
- J$ \# A! ]/ j2 {/ V4 V6 p5 G# p- X5 B& P0 c1 M
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? " t& K$ V* X( H: s2 Z( D
; n) J* s7 ~9 A

$ U3 i- [' V3 g7 {- \4 d% n+ \# r) U8 dGround combat at Kuala
% A1 R' N& t7 Q, Z7 e; |" z
% L$ u3 u- D& G% `3 {Allied Shock attack / ~7 J6 q) g5 H" W2 H$ G$ t

. t, L4 s; h5 l+ H. D4 b* iAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2 . E; u" P3 C; k" q
5 r0 s7 a. e8 G5 B( V; Q0 w
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5 0 B% o+ M4 ]5 ?7 ]6 v( Q. r

  C; t' |/ I$ J$ [+ oAllied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0 1 S# n) Q. D& F8 _+ E: y
% I3 t! i4 T+ Y# w2 }( ~
Japanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1
  m" G5 k$ Z% E3 M  t  f. }9 t7 X1 h) Z
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)
  A% h5 n% U- K) m7 g$ p* |/ w! \9 X( p5 ?/ Q
Allied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!! 8 m& _5 C( E9 x! q1 c$ W/ u
5 G4 T6 ~& I* V. j
# O2 W4 R1 ]/ V( V$ ^
Allied ground losses: 5 m9 M& N5 W' k
24 casualties reported ' K/ a4 _( j) R6 u, o
Guns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表, x. A& ~6 Y/ V/ m9 H" X
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
8 `) w/ K4 f  n" i+ D. x! Z
. u* x( A6 x" S9 V- ?最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
3 ]  Z* k0 f" c% M1 |7 U5 }
% B4 n" p' n: K- E* h+ t
: z1 l( t' W1 Q/ |: `+ K: VGround combat at Kuala
8 s% S+ l3 J8 d# b/ \" N* l' O' Z  W$ f' f
Allied Shock attack
. I( N( d6 i7 W2 ]' w
/ z6 D# h9 L- d5 A' EAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
- u: d7 {. ?: ]9 R* Q1 y

$ ?5 r5 ?' G- s/ a
, ^0 y) X- I/ n这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙??
这四个明显是逃兵啊,死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄
一万年太久,只争朝夕!

回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊,这怎么可能!
估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。
这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...
死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了,但0:1的比分就不能理解了
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表5 g5 z$ z& L7 z8 m+ z5 o2 D1 t
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??. Y) a5 V+ V! f, n$ l; n. x2 j
8 h$ H4 F, P' t6 Y; z: x  x
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
/ T" w; _! ]# W" Q; F4 p  U. P( z) O
! ^& ~0 n% n, w* W% U
Ground combat at Kuala
+ P) R/ f) G/ j
# x" Z! `5 u6 D# DAllied Shock attack
+ t: H3 z+ n0 `, ^$ }
& A2 ?. i" @" F2 D  y9 x7 d9 IAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
& O3 ~! z. P2 |/ z( o9 ^: P
' X, y' s, [. ^: l8 b" M# j8 ^& S所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈!
那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.
返回列表