返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
; K0 g, h" v" l( O# ]+ _! M7 A! A0 y: c8 \4 U" H. L
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE7 H! m& o  d7 ]; y1 q4 u" p4 X
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
% b/ X9 n6 i1 O2 p& C/ Q! @5 q& Vrange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
; a& F6 B. g. x  s' ^1 ?$ |instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
: c: u. y3 B& t- P1 c) nGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
. `5 v* K, W! ccould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
8 f* C5 X  X3 k( |8 I. \  vsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
) U) a( w  `8 H5 `, Q2 E6 @* \& @and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when9 M: j# {% u6 V. a' m2 o
planning operations that require such high risk." g. u9 c3 ~+ q( a
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 ! U$ @1 {; K4 ]( ~5 I" K' p3 }: s

3 ~- x3 k8 T+ K2 E9 T中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理; M5 \! W5 _3 }! K* g
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表