返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
5 i% M/ O7 p; Z  ~- P4 q7 ?7 Z! G* C7 A/ @/ o
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE" A( Q; h, g' m6 B
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended& c+ e" e, Y: e+ k" i' y
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with* v, b" {) h1 r* z! T& P8 B! Q
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of, W$ H. |# T0 l5 \* O
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
7 L  Z+ l; {9 X. n9 mcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
6 l! A- x1 D! K/ V1 V* Y+ Zsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
0 a8 N" |4 E3 s) aand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
) V$ S  y; t* Gplanning operations that require such high risk.2 K0 z6 K1 E- W1 c4 j' r
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 1 c$ `' I  `% \3 L/ v. p

* s  V8 ~# A8 }6 s8 _中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理* }3 q5 z. s+ I
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表