返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 2 m! d0 ]% f, b
# @' g; |* {7 A  t) l
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE: [+ w) f, f" V0 O8 Z: L; c
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
, O9 W* g/ W# j7 r) w  Orange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with) }0 p" \7 k; b, o9 n6 @
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of6 V$ x4 B, b8 o' r6 j# t
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but% S; n, K$ A. i2 z1 ^
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will  d: K2 ^% V$ m) f/ K) ]( ?& F
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
# Y) @6 {. y4 k5 Hand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
# U! R3 n' M  F; iplanning operations that require such high risk.( V& K& {% R! U3 M8 W
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 - r" g* k$ u' Z7 ^7 N4 z

5 Q6 Z( d, g" a' @中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理( P  [" K# I4 i  T" n# i1 O
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表