返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
, H5 c' d4 D0 }  K! ]  A, P* V5 i0 o2 t4 t$ g5 I. g( R6 l  v
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE% X2 [9 L9 H  f3 s5 @
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended3 M5 H8 c  H! Y; F4 u) c# ^) i
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with1 o+ @' ?1 K% d( Q1 V: o
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of2 k7 r# V, E& t, f: b+ x
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but) d8 m% X5 ]) k4 ?3 v8 |3 ~  n  q
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will: ~4 w0 p, I" p' U9 s
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
. Z; v& C6 i8 J! v$ E, oand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when8 T& m4 w8 d5 a' Q9 v  r$ k# d0 n6 @
planning operations that require such high risk.! _/ E4 _+ D- `- u1 z' y8 N6 `/ J/ e
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
2 c0 J6 S/ Q/ r$ ^, Z1 A& M; V
" z. A/ ?( Z# p' U3 B; q& A2 c中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理0 E( \  S: b& p1 I/ j( {7 Y  T) |8 H0 e
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表