返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
! ~5 E# i4 K# h3 k& }% n5 s% e5 R& s" C; {6 a
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
) D: t- a# t4 n3 q' o( V2 PThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended, u- i. `* M& Q3 J% l, H
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
. d: E) U* h0 H2 f8 p  Iinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
7 x5 Q: j/ S* \7 S3 n; |Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but7 o4 \) |* h2 k6 O; Z( Z
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
* {% z/ k/ p+ o4 I& Esuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
" H9 O4 M# z3 Z( {: F6 j1 [and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when, g8 J  ^& [' R8 k4 a- j
planning operations that require such high risk.) `. D* X& J' m) Q; w; A
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 , L' F& Y. @3 D

, Y8 R3 i1 M; x% N! c" f9 ]/ t中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
. K2 Y+ J, T; I* a1 k扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表