返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
+ f  R" g% O9 n1 T+ t/ ~5 t5 ~3 I) c9 U5 d5 B" M- P) N8 v- Y% O
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
' d! S# o! L8 X& B, I* T! J; z' l. tThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
+ C5 N$ @# y7 Q: a+ [* _range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with& A/ O0 F; m, H: @. q
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of3 ]: J+ o; r) B& z5 l! S
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but. V' s9 L, A6 P# E% H
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
- @, t& g; F! i5 \: o- Y3 F0 {! p4 dsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
; j0 H% b/ \4 ], _3 c, \* ~and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
, K- l1 C* }8 z8 g6 Nplanning operations that require such high risk.
" E$ q6 b  J5 c( R谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 " o. A2 D) y$ ~# R
0 q. Y& n  u2 ]+ |6 j* C, [" c
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
+ S3 g3 L! Y; m. W$ l扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表