返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
3 G9 E  w; x( W! f1 L1 T& H" |6 Z
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
4 P/ i6 M" y( `: Z7 b: K/ iThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended) }  h. C/ b$ f6 p. X3 B" G
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with7 i- u- W0 t! P# R0 x
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of  s! ^! k4 Y  G9 i- a
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but. r! A! ^8 Z3 _% k- v
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
6 h+ o  [8 Z3 q; @: \- a8 L8 }suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
% d3 c$ Y# ~4 A# {! c+ fand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
  f5 k8 T+ W( H" O  B6 @+ Uplanning operations that require such high risk." q+ m: s9 X, [: Y
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
; F2 v+ G' G( {% F8 l1 e7 `7 q. h' B" D
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理4 ^3 `* H5 u" D" W
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表