燃烧的岛群军史学习论坛 - Powered by Discuz! Board

标题: 日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达 [打印本页]

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:07 标题: 日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43 6 z+ |+ {: j4 c$ w: h; P

Japanese aircraft
Ki-100 Tony x 36
" X& T+ Y$ ]0 p4 \$ A: p
Allied aircraft 0 |8 c8 b& D+ Z
B-29 Superfortress x 33 $ |: o* j- @" @

Japanese aircraft losses " m5 @. ]$ p4 o$ ?6 I5 R( N ]
Ki-100 Tony: 12 damaged
/ O) x9 X+ K V) u9 Y6 b: t
Allied aircraft losses * t+ _# U. i( R& p
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed

Japanese ground losses: 7 I" J3 f9 O9 @
34 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 13

原来B-29真是纸老虎，日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差，但结果却有天壤之别。3 F* w! r# A$ C

从这些战果看，得出对付B-29的结论是，日本夜间防空没戏，速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要（没有机炮的先靠边站）。* v- X/ e5 o4 `9 N

Our fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25!
Can't keep this up for long

; b3 `4 r: x+ J" s

Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 20
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24 8 \6 d/ d- C- S$ U7 ?" ?' P

Allied aircraft & @! n- H0 ]) x4 N9 k9 ]1 |9 ^
B-29 Superfortress x 260 . D4 d. t/ A1 [1 ^, E# V2 E9 j
' x/ v$ A5 {. J8 j3 v7 ]. k
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged   s" U& B$ Y4 @, Q
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged ) x7 L$ G+ z. w' {

Allied aircraft losses
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged : d( r# H% U( B/ _7 M) c
9 P# o/ r' |. V" [  Q
Japanese ground losses:
204 casualties reported
Guns lost 5 - ]8 o& ~' z5 `! G# D3 _

Airbase hits 66
Airbase supply hits 5 9 R+ L# X% }; v/ M$ ^
Runway hits 364& U1 b3 c2 \+ x4 S) D& c4 C5 G
0 l. }# P$ ^( ]4 w5 U8 Y
8 K* M5 b; Y, E5 N* h7 \
这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢，我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的，空中损失的主要是五式战，紫电被击伤的多，击落的少。
0 h1 |& T) n  Z& R1 F
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 5 N$ A6 l3 e; a) {. Z/ c  [3 U
4 W. ?* j4 F8 E; O! t3 `
Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 4 % _) w: D5 d3 n9 ?# P
N1K1-J George x 33   N, l3 R3 a5 r4 C4 H! e& P
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5
Ki-100 Tony x 18

Allied aircraft
B-29 Superfortress x 155 * _- E9 S' R" k: }. T6 \  |

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed / _( r& n3 K8 U2 b* y2 E1 Q, f
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Ki-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged ; P$ m* }, b# C" q3 O) e6 c
H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed ' K/ x2 m, t, S
Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed
; L, ?# h# u3 i* p4 F5 V0 ]! N, ]" Q
Allied aircraft losses
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged2 Q, O( R0 w% W( f. V

[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:20

疾风丙终于表演了一次，太差了…………远不如五式战，怎么搞得。

: _+ {; h. b5 f7 u! v

Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54 ( w$ v' W3 E8 j* H% O
. c  a' V0 H( D& Z4 S% ?
Japanese aircraft 5 `( c$ Z! z! k% s
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31

Allied aircraft - h5 \* s0 B  ?! ~4 N1 V& j3 E& c" e
B-29 Superfortress x 12 8 i; T6 ?0 @( K% K! Q- J! B1 D
! l" m" y: ^# h6 T
海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低，或者调高日军飞机战斗力，否则的话海盗等于零，因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。

Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52

Japanese aircraft $ s+ R) h% [$ \* G  J8 R
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22
Ki-100 Tony x 15
Ki-102a Randy x 13 ; {0 P% c) A1 O& H( F4 g8 b: P

Allied aircraft
F4U-1D Corsair x 20

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged : I- h7 H# R& @. ]
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
Ki-102a Randy: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses 5 V! M  i3 b$ H" B8 L8 ?. a
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
$ H( J+ v/ C5 h* a/ _0 [
* e! V, R3 G7 q' h  @
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged 0 ^. V# m8 ~" z1 y5 h/ y# B- r+ _  Y

Allied aircraft losses , r9 F" z) R8 v' i: @  [2 ~  l& I6 u
B-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:24

198架神风出击，只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧，还嫌停机率不够高？早说了，Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………+ _/ M. P8 X, F

虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了，但就算没有防空…………8 Y; B& a/ K7 u* A4 I

Day Air attack on TF at 52,52

Japanese aircraft $ e5 W8 K8 ?* ?
A6M5 Zeke x 32 % w0 x1 }. \4 k' F6 p
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2

Japanese aircraft losses * z7 X% L2 f: l, E# M$ _
A6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
* [: k9 e ?( `0 Q4 P
Allied Ships & U% L& t3 e1 ~! D
APD John P. Gray
APD Ray K. Edwards + d, O- k, v% Y$ V: b/ j
AK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1 % s* K9 M: z: x! Z
DE Day " k5 Y. j6 h! i, O" |. ?

Allied ground losses: / k, b C0 @' G8 C
51 casualties reported % V3 r& l0 W+ y: d5 R, F# w7 u; j2 }6 F
Guns lost 2 0 @1 l6 O8 L2 ?, P
Vehicles lost 1

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:27

游戏里应该嵌入代码，大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失，现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:36

看看后期盟军强到什么地步，0比1也能赢？？0 ?* A4 _& c1 @
5 M( _1 v3 Z. o
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人？？

# K5 i$ ^, V A: n
^/ J! B7 `8 c( _6 k
Ground combat at Kuala
) \6 }* @$ J$ t1 i. }8 T8 c
Allied Shock attack
$ B. U: v! t) U' s
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2

Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5
9 W1 Y- }" S0 V( X& I
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0

Japanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1 ' b/ W5 x* P8 K- z' f

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!!
6 X: s' d( I3 d$ b( n: |8 M
* R( z' _) @% d
Allied ground losses:
24 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

作者: chars 时间: 2007-6-24 19:06

原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表8 M+ H3 j) t% s$ V: ^( f
看看后期盟军强到什么地步，0比1也能赢？？
5 X2 q+ W* N2 c* ]4 J9 ?: s
+ F. h+ M6 D+ k  z4 T; [; P* ]最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人？？
' k* }% q" `  I7 O% J  m! E4 z5 ~; F! j
3 }4 C( D1 g* `. O3 z
Ground combat at Kuala . G0 ?' g  y' U. D- O
* C$ g1 F9 t1 F4 O2 p
Allied Shock attack 3 _; s; |% Q% L! ]
2 W& y5 M7 F" u  w1 ]
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...

, g& d' B6 Q4 Y( e: N: M; g

这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙？？

作者: 飞龙 时间: 2007-6-24 19:10

这四个明显是逃兵啊，死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄

作者: zhengxuacmilan 时间: 2007-6-25 10:18 标题: 回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊，这怎么可能！

作者: harry 时间: 2007-6-25 10:45

估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。

作者: hades1001 时间: 2007-6-25 11:15

这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...

作者: xuanyuan 时间: 2007-6-25 16:57

死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了，但0：1的比分就不能理解了

作者: Muller 时间: 2007-7-12 11:24

原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表0 I7 X4 f/ z+ k$ w
看看后期盟军强到什么地步，0比1也能赢？？
) z! h. L3 D& r% h! x' }) ^5 ]% F0 S, w# Q
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人？？
! p0 h9 z& h% ?' z
( R5 k6 @( s9 T; _! r3 x( A6 A8 F9 Z
Ground combat at Kuala . O- W2 Y: |* z
, ^6 W- \0 L2 o9 F
Allied Shock attack 0 X; K# V9 ^9 c# e

3 T- ]+ c" A& @' R+ L! ?3 JAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...

所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈！

作者: 阿姆罗 时间: 2007-7-12 11:49

那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.

欢迎光临燃烧的岛群军史学习论坛 (http://www.bikooo.com/)