返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43
/ E$ c1 ~6 O( v' u. N+ h" F4 i( v) [% m( K, \3 a% t
Japanese aircraft
. ^( N0 Z+ Z+ N/ ~Ki-100 Tony x 36 0 f! i9 c, Z: s/ O% A4 E
( I5 F5 J( n2 ~( |* G# l8 ?
Allied aircraft % x$ ]* n% C/ F) @
B-29 Superfortress x 33
5 D- d0 `$ z; v; J8 l1 F
* s' {0 v' Y3 o5 [6 @Japanese aircraft losses
5 l3 e% i. H  q9 T7 |: tKi-100 Tony: 12 damaged " o" u5 I$ I3 }

) h! U. |  X% ?4 tAllied aircraft losses
  a& r6 [  p- R; x! QB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed 0 G3 D' }; n+ b, T4 P

5 o0 R- W/ p9 h3 n1 EJapanese ground losses:
  p* n$ M) v2 u- Q4 g# Z34 casualties reported 1 @3 y3 }$ i6 n$ M' H9 u) I2 M
Guns lost 1
- H5 a2 o+ e5 r  K) y0 E1 d
" D% S/ a8 @) z2 uAirbase hits 5 : p3 Q  O9 f+ F4 {
Airbase supply hits 2 1 @8 A5 \) ~, M# t+ h% _5 v
Runway hits 13
2 Q" h, `+ e  r& `& _  m: L0 t5 {& y" ^

, t+ a: j9 J2 y% u0 x0 D原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。" u. N+ }  A$ M1 t4 b- o/ d

4 ?" M  `4 u; Y9 I/ k从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。6 b% w+ ~1 u8 y5 k* V. `

( Z7 M9 f# y. z8 j
1 {" Q% K; p6 ~Our fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25! ) X" M0 Q5 ]: l: P  s7 n
Can't keep this up for long
7 P; Z/ H; m  G- z7 w
: w# R9 _! V$ S8 ?  aDay Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51
0 A" g5 o4 p: G& {& g
$ q" p0 U  c# b6 L9 |Japanese aircraft
5 b" ?. t3 ]+ ?# ]0 X! y' U( z" @A6M5 Zeke x 20
5 @% i) h. d4 T. {2 s! AKi-84-Ic Frank x 24
+ n6 q7 F. B& b! d
6 x% T% h. ~0 r% b8 E5 YAllied aircraft " z/ M. W' r( z6 E
B-29 Superfortress x 260 9 w9 |& P8 `5 H9 L6 y* Z7 M, d
  U. f# ]3 ^1 K  h0 W
Japanese aircraft losses
6 V+ |1 x. m' u: V; V9 X1 }$ dA6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged
9 b+ m5 H. h2 r1 [5 ^& E1 t! X. LKi-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged ! W0 n% e" k* s# h( W; b' [

; J3 i& I4 I$ f0 n0 V, O* _% rAllied aircraft losses ! t, m( p, R3 k3 m: C2 x
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged ; G1 _: e8 I" I" x; z- {
0 P% \. ~- D6 ?* m2 v& M
Japanese ground losses: 3 q8 Y, J6 l& k( a
204 casualties reported ( ^) ]8 A7 i7 M9 B; F
Guns lost 5
5 z! t) Z# I+ P2 M. m( n
' z% n/ ]6 g$ w, A1 A( b. VAirbase hits 66
# x& _) o3 _( [% m. u% V, SAirbase supply hits 5 # @0 E4 g) O$ p; u7 a' ^+ K
Runway hits 364+ G% Y9 c% c  A, ^6 ?

( g7 c, Y- _. W . d* C7 j6 \1 ?% h0 Q7 \9 i
这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。  E5 D- F* D3 |6 ]$ q/ J+ {0 _
8 o$ w% ]' i. D
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
6 }; E; O, D3 j
6 X- y6 w/ b. q$ A' u2 Q: E& yJapanese aircraft 9 c4 J1 O+ b7 q7 c
A6M5 Zeke x 4 # j1 c+ o8 J6 u$ j6 `
N1K1-J George x 33 - S) b# D$ `0 r( Y
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5 ; }5 B3 @" b" l; o4 B2 c- z7 p
Ki-100 Tony x 18
- V) u# v* M( T  z3 T0 u  r; K' Q( l* N. N7 F% [8 i/ F5 G
Allied aircraft 9 y9 I5 h3 {( B% K: f0 f8 S/ G$ \
B-29 Superfortress x 155
& w/ e6 t% P7 V6 S( \# Q
( l. u4 u2 ]$ }9 Y7 GJapanese aircraft losses " F/ f8 d' s7 b. n5 J' g  m# M: a; G
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed
  j# h  S& P# V5 lN1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged 8 O: H# I; Y  @% ]$ _7 J
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged . ~3 u$ g8 |5 _/ s- z
Ki-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged - `" I5 F' G9 l9 {# [/ I- \
H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed   N8 c3 Y1 T: @& r0 z' Y
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed , W- @3 k4 P& b) @: l! C
Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed
' z2 E2 n* k9 t* j' Y  p
( Z" R% W. Q$ @/ r1 `: o) ^$ r5 M, fAllied aircraft losses
& p5 R' y& V& U: l  dB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged5 H& k6 X7 c6 C! F# @
/ Z! [( y; Z0 Y9 B9 y
[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。 5 g6 [6 R+ |7 R( L$ p8 R. M) p' ?

  C. a1 k: b- {1 O! oDay Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
( F8 z, z5 _" i3 C$ A% N2 c* Z0 x
1 w6 V; K0 I4 q0 B4 aJapanese aircraft % j* l/ Z) i5 g, d8 C% b* d& M
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31
$ X; G% y' ?- O9 {' M
: Z' d$ {! S  V1 K% OAllied aircraft
- S7 z$ |! V$ C0 c( KB-29 Superfortress x 12 9 k9 s1 i+ R- n  {. S
% e# V. e1 H+ L3 Y
海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。
% a2 X) u+ A7 I+ U
, ]# k0 A; S3 S0 ?Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 $ \  d1 B- w% u: y
) z& x- o" T, N7 y
Japanese aircraft   n. ^1 U3 _  T" w# x/ U) l; [
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22 / {! I) O* ?5 u6 U
Ki-100 Tony x 15
3 E4 Y' Y& O; ^3 N) BKi-102a Randy x 13 7 B: \! q8 N: w. n/ e

! }- F+ c2 n4 l3 D: c1 wAllied aircraft ( e8 d5 U1 e3 s. g% O  X6 D3 L
F4U-1D Corsair x 20 9 C7 J: p+ x% E9 C- W

0 ]# d% h$ X$ Z4 T7 _8 zJapanese aircraft losses 5 \& Q3 m  X$ c* g
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged * Q: e" E( z3 U' B
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
4 Y8 q! H, T( v# S$ [Ki-102a Randy: 2 destroyed # d) o: y7 \1 Z* w- ~2 U

1 K5 E' y& ~/ z3 pAllied aircraft losses % j; {+ w6 I5 w: x* O9 K$ H
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged 0 q! u. O# }' r/ K% W; j& Y. ^. d
9 a# O' M, f' z, p' e, c
. g) |& f  o/ S/ i
Japanese aircraft losses
0 h4 X  A* D/ U% {Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged
# |3 P; s+ o6 f" Y* c" F; ~9 n% D8 L+ Y0 Y* P( g
Allied aircraft losses
7 i4 o. Z/ h; e( g" NB-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………) N# \0 @) S; }! A  c% r3 j3 a/ O

0 w! J3 J* W2 w; V2 j3 D虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………8 ]- i% h" x  C) r' c

) T% [$ W4 ^: g2 M0 WDay Air attack on TF at 52,52 2 K, ]( `* G* i; b0 R& A1 Q

1 ]! y6 v+ B+ j* P, cJapanese aircraft   O- c& w1 L) P# e$ R% e  ?; w; G7 ~, w
A6M5 Zeke x 32 2 v1 a0 ]% G6 n0 G
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2
; V8 B5 @8 Z7 b
4 L; N! @! y. t! K0 nJapanese aircraft losses . Z2 K  b, b; K% [5 Y8 R
A6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
; C- r. J( A* J- n0 U! C9 _, ~! @9 J8 U
Allied Ships
% M  e. r7 m0 N& dAPD John P. Gray * M, \* k  f* x% F$ c% U7 O( f5 H
APD Ray K. Edwards 3 L0 \. h% u) a" O
AK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1 3 s4 S. l& ?% l' F
DE Day
! d" H$ q  a0 P9 \0 A* k" L; ], k2 S  [  V; H/ t
Allied ground losses: - u( ~# h; N3 D% F
51 casualties reported
- e0 V  `$ [3 MGuns lost 2 0 T0 B% a1 d6 b0 c( U- J- o
Vehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
0 k3 k  p5 A& C% l, C* [9 U
( X2 w; O/ Z+ C8 f' j2 |4 j4 O' M最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? + E, }" b2 m( w. @. X
* q8 T+ Q9 K- D6 j' `( K
9 m8 n7 F6 X6 T8 q' x4 U
Ground combat at Kuala
& a# i7 S# w" V* D2 z' m3 Y. z9 {9 S" j: u
Allied Shock attack
9 w, s( x; P9 e
$ V# y4 n" D" ~# }. a6 L4 aAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2
% q: b% X" j! M! j' A% k* d/ F; d% F: w0 [8 }3 ~
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5
6 a2 N$ F0 _" z% t* d' O' ^- j- W2 W
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0
$ O2 L. d5 d2 |2 f, c) u, N9 o3 o2 o  |" y1 z
Japanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1
7 g. G* A' c' C8 [, H
  x0 B2 ]& B1 x; jAllied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)
6 T' {  }2 T: H- g- z
4 T7 [. m) n& q( ?/ MAllied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!!
  P% R1 ^. |; M0 F  \1 V
6 J1 p( l  E( A6 d' V. D1 o, y: c+ `) h- G1 p
Allied ground losses:
% ]" ^' n0 s. C24 casualties reported 1 T* |% p1 H- R! X6 i1 ]
Guns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
返回列表