返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 + i2 X" r9 d! [. D1 g8 @; T! r! f

2 g, w' F8 L, i+ P3 V5 ]0 e  ^2 b8 ]3 I& M7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE7 K2 l3 t) @" j9 l6 \% y/ g
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended. _% A: Z- {7 w+ n4 [5 K5 S
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
' k0 E& A- `/ l3 [: v$ b' f' dinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of6 N, G) ?. Y% t: w
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
. o$ T  n$ @) v1 N) ]5 jcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will3 `& {2 u) \4 b
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal& j3 f0 o5 W5 g5 J) ^7 E8 n
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
( z- o' P+ n; |+ d% a1 h2 splanning operations that require such high risk.
$ ]" C; S5 X* A* d9 Z6 x0 l: z# [6 E谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
: x) r* H7 @3 a2 u( I- x5 v! W' m
+ `! p' y% q  R0 N中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
- q+ @: Y( _$ h+ F扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表