返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 & Q  {8 y  e. z/ W0 X

- w/ m: `; h9 d1 {: c. y7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE; D+ T5 n$ B/ O1 r+ B! S4 `
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended8 S  `' d$ ]7 L+ O" Y
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with3 s6 V, O# b( i
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
$ w- L- y$ v5 [0 NGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but" ?1 I+ V8 T' S1 O& _
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
) [. J$ `8 b- D, X% Ssuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal1 W$ o8 f4 e: ^0 r3 ]1 G  ~6 c4 w# G
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
- x, n; }  K1 V6 \planning operations that require such high risk.
& ?9 X4 B0 X: i( L5 p) a( u谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
0 ^6 |- m+ }: T' A" [; R: @! C; F3 |
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
, R5 B: R7 q9 k8 u& {' K扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表