返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 : N4 P% e! T9 z! V0 D

8 b9 c/ a: b$ w/ t* F) y+ b0 o7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
5 S( v7 w2 g% b- V4 E9 [The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
( d# a# h: f7 D$ F* `: F- t2 Frange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
& k# U6 M$ N/ G) _) Z* ]instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
$ k" t' x: b3 v2 P* K! _- WGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but3 L3 _& [0 B7 B
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will) p  ^8 r6 P8 h8 {+ l1 [/ {, R
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal' q5 u! M4 e% m
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when9 [0 V: j6 j9 U9 J2 _! D5 K
planning operations that require such high risk.; Z3 m# h/ z0 o1 z4 ~' h6 d
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
- k. X# H+ t2 ?8 \0 Q
9 ~% n+ h8 V* X7 G; K中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
- _2 @. G4 k. M7 y扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表