返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
) e+ k; e! Y1 r* ]6 E/ {5 Q
- d# _0 v  Q! D) I/ ^7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE2 [2 c8 ^9 u7 G% p, R- ]2 W
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended+ d- W% S# Y! Y) K5 N/ j
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with" p  W6 Q8 _$ ]9 ^9 h% ?4 ]' w0 X% r
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
1 A/ m, L  m6 b3 h8 r0 E; g& cGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
6 h7 I1 M# b" x# n' {could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will. z; x4 e& |2 Z/ W, I& }
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
4 c# @3 U% w' K* W% ^and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when$ X: m# Z2 e0 ~2 I/ T/ \: R: g
planning operations that require such high risk." E* q, g9 y- c  A6 t: A2 F
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
( G: N/ I- z7 O: P1 Y
; R/ U7 C" B1 [8 D6 G! A; ?, \* r中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
: ?  Z  q$ d7 x% X% U扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表