返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
+ n2 u9 [1 n. o+ y. j# u8 b  c
/ a8 L. D* @4 D% P" J; j. f) J7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE! r8 I+ I  s/ H/ q  {2 q5 z% ~
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
" z# l8 n/ W& Y" Lrange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
/ x- G3 h" m- M7 |8 P# ]0 zinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
, l$ h6 U0 U& I/ j; h) HGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but5 J  F4 G  {+ ], n" l4 D3 j' P
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will: H) C; `) m# z. m+ g+ L$ U: G
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal% w7 Q5 I! M1 T" [/ ^5 X! A! a
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when3 @& D% b7 O3 E) n  t+ c
planning operations that require such high risk.
5 |& A2 r# C8 f% m0 M1 U8 f% o: M谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
8 s) s* j+ C1 O
4 G0 D( e2 S. v2 t" o中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理4 W- ?9 ?( @1 X
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表