返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 % K3 I7 g& L1 I" U7 H- N/ t
: e7 r/ C' [8 Y: x! }" v
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
/ ~( _  B# q2 K' _1 _5 VThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended6 H6 R7 ~- J4 o3 _1 N% Y
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with( C+ k& J7 B6 H; D% t
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of7 S9 j! g  {: N  Q1 ~2 a
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
3 k% h# d5 L  [8 r% y( [8 b( Tcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will$ V" g* u: j7 o! L
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
7 n6 h4 P/ d* h8 y, q  m% |and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
2 k7 _$ U0 J" Fplanning operations that require such high risk./ [& z/ e- W1 F/ l% G/ N& }. G
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
' [! N2 m" [! B. m. ~
+ f2 w; q& a/ Z3 A4 d2 A中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理' k1 R$ W. ?1 Y# ~- Y
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表