返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43
! ]# Q# S" V! P" z8 H. ^4 C% r& g* H" P
Japanese aircraft
* y% e3 D3 e1 c: }2 J: a, {! FKi-100 Tony x 36
9 z. m/ ~* `5 a# T1 u% u2 ?% Y8 E- i# L0 z
Allied aircraft
6 ~2 j4 [/ E$ {6 {/ w" _B-29 Superfortress x 33 8 r, T+ A" o. T+ Z9 B5 q$ v
& K$ A* I# ?: u& L% l
Japanese aircraft losses * t& V! M! v+ a- w- c
Ki-100 Tony: 12 damaged
) X$ \% I& l4 |1 g1 V$ D# n( n2 V0 Q( _; [, v/ d5 A9 l6 M) D
Allied aircraft losses ! b6 G  x  b3 }3 M% w7 T
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed
. q' G, b) ~2 n5 j
9 u0 F3 V4 ^* X5 i8 c# I4 U# F+ JJapanese ground losses:   |1 Z8 A$ o$ g( J
34 casualties reported
; o0 E& G+ \  K% {+ IGuns lost 1 ! g8 b: d6 H6 f

# l& A9 Z* L3 |: L2 RAirbase hits 5 " M- M' g& K3 g; _/ G7 l
Airbase supply hits 2
6 N  ]. y% }! r" qRunway hits 13
- ?" P4 |2 P/ Z/ f3 V
4 L0 E+ S  ?3 Y' L
8 u2 s4 D, K7 Z* N5 F( r原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。
7 _6 `. G. H$ k: J: T6 T$ {
2 {( {' V, d7 ~$ T. H从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。- Z, Z( z; [9 A. Q9 {6 q& v

: T  r" j& x9 o3 ^0 `$ |3 z4 Y+ R  D( _3 I1 m$ t& h" r
Our fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25!
4 g, x& z+ A3 S7 D2 @Can't keep this up for long
, k1 e; M1 B- w: |6 M  [  R# o- G8 e* o! H- r
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51 ) I- k6 e3 J" M  M

2 S" `  Z' X1 K/ v- k5 l% @2 e# R- ZJapanese aircraft 6 R. @7 B8 ~8 Y0 V5 z
A6M5 Zeke x 20 , G  ^; T- [) R9 t; G2 S. u& l
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24
2 x* {7 x( c0 S7 i; f7 C& K
* r% X9 {4 H: |2 R$ fAllied aircraft
. o' Y) X/ d! R+ I" pB-29 Superfortress x 260
" Q. k+ ]: u' f. Y$ r9 E" N9 q0 H8 U; m
Japanese aircraft losses
7 V! R2 C* ~1 `: A! B5 z5 UA6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged
' R# m& a& \! DKi-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged
5 K: q1 g( v! B" i) g4 o) i* G4 o& u6 [% T6 c
Allied aircraft losses ' r# p9 c/ B3 p: f/ u6 U
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged
5 ]* S! A# h% M$ N+ R  F; A+ U% F% t' s5 }9 Q4 e
Japanese ground losses:
$ U( v+ V/ }+ }7 N& B204 casualties reported
9 o* C0 O6 o6 a! o2 wGuns lost 5 ' q# Q" i9 s% n# r' p

+ q% m5 g4 ^2 Q4 X5 VAirbase hits 66
$ B3 K: ]3 b  AAirbase supply hits 5
5 b3 b' _. N& s: uRunway hits 3647 v( W  J0 w- y( K2 Q

2 t1 }# Y: S" A% ]
2 P4 Q7 G6 b; y这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。- d' t2 g3 Q/ b8 o" r7 ?
  Z- V' S' x0 ^! M* h* e
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 % V3 q' Z; e% L$ F: L/ l; c

- o5 i, b9 D7 n8 c4 k# dJapanese aircraft * S  l: ~/ s0 _0 z
A6M5 Zeke x 4
& A0 k8 Y! {4 R# y4 v- U% q, |N1K1-J George x 33
% X% b+ Y/ R7 V0 O. fKi-43-IIa Oscar x 5
" L4 r6 v2 |4 HKi-100 Tony x 18 3 _4 B+ u( Q- a9 ~1 i
; ]# X, [  f( B6 P* t# E2 L
Allied aircraft
$ L( M8 W7 g) d% L0 m0 e  JB-29 Superfortress x 155   C+ w. Z4 M2 J+ j% a" ^8 n. J

. y0 P5 l/ v" YJapanese aircraft losses 6 m# m9 a7 l% Z, v& J
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed
" D3 m, R9 _8 C: y8 h: ?% D' r1 P. vN1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged 8 A, `* X( {" a+ c
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged 3 h1 {" B3 x1 }( P+ d9 {
Ki-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged + z1 F0 z& g& e
H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed ( T& |+ G1 N( ?
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed
( I  d1 @( S' ^) ?Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed 8 a( d4 t+ }, |$ x4 _
; t! e/ K2 l5 g. S1 O0 {5 m
Allied aircraft losses ; R# t8 |% M* n6 v
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged
) U' [6 g9 [& k5 y- ~
4 S& [2 [/ B& o+ d- U  `2 s[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。
" n6 _9 A+ a' R& N! s4 K4 b4 b5 e6 R. h
Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
! Y% x! d7 C, @; Q+ F0 o  ]) m$ z+ Y4 ^" k! o  B
Japanese aircraft   \" L( j& t" w3 C1 P9 G
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31
* @' v+ W' e0 t2 Y  P; h& X; _
% H1 Z6 X3 h& T% ^9 v& U) m3 ~" SAllied aircraft + c  |- b3 T* O
B-29 Superfortress x 12
( G6 K% ^9 m' }. X
: b3 z  T0 `" z: A6 I海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。0 a" f) X2 Q4 ^4 p; l
4 g+ }5 V' M+ W0 n8 ~  @) x
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
5 U- i, h0 \2 G
& Z- |& z/ T( L" t$ XJapanese aircraft 5 Z& E9 ]* b' @( ~' [% |0 |
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22 8 v9 @& W* c7 k: e8 r& p7 [4 J
Ki-100 Tony x 15
  ]6 n9 R. v( f9 T& lKi-102a Randy x 13
) M/ d! {* z7 ^4 ]; }" p& h3 ]$ x6 q4 X, }
Allied aircraft
6 c7 V" w. s* _, t. K/ xF4U-1D Corsair x 20
' Y* h; J# F) ]1 R
2 p/ s1 _7 V* Y( s' _% S8 @Japanese aircraft losses
0 A8 g9 v4 ?+ @7 HKi-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged ! C' B$ R$ {" t
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
& [# S/ @* s4 m; C8 u8 aKi-102a Randy: 2 destroyed
3 J7 A/ U  B& h9 x9 T  L) T
5 ]3 q& g( V2 R; q( mAllied aircraft losses 9 W6 V( Z" s: Q# f7 A. K8 ?
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged ! p, K3 _2 R0 p+ e5 x- m  Q
& F* e7 N! a$ F( B7 A% W+ A

. c- R/ O6 f; V( a, ZJapanese aircraft losses
" g- Z! a% \6 W: S9 B0 S& b) V$ MKi-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged & F/ L: F( w; w& _8 h- Z$ |' H
  H. d; s8 M' l7 |
Allied aircraft losses
5 H, i% U7 U5 s0 |0 }8 M3 `$ ]" sB-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………8 X- G/ ]$ C5 F# E% ]

# t$ ~+ v) c$ E3 x1 n( R% o* {2 Z虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………: G6 }: s+ e4 z3 h7 E' L5 }; c6 u
5 F) V2 G8 d: o' l9 z
Day Air attack on TF at 52,52 : e! ^+ n: y+ h. v0 ]1 K

" \" v% |& [7 T, Z* e, }Japanese aircraft ; |) S1 ^$ ~  j4 r
A6M5 Zeke x 32
; Y& U( U0 C- t0 V: K$ z2 wKi-43-IIa Oscar x 2 7 w) g) \% X" G4 o+ m
. G4 x3 z* O- B3 w* L
Japanese aircraft losses
6 M5 O6 w1 `1 r; h$ Y6 n  ?A6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
; n/ a8 F6 e) F* d; O
$ O6 x2 l) F5 h* ^Allied Ships 7 K9 R7 w+ D  Q: q4 @+ Z# p! ?; D
APD John P. Gray
) `/ W  K3 R/ O" p3 x: fAPD Ray K. Edwards
( ~9 U8 H9 t/ [% u3 IAK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1
; @$ L+ s2 i; }( }$ eDE Day : r6 u# _7 u% b& V$ `& n
9 k/ W1 M1 r: m4 X3 L; J
Allied ground losses: 0 L  ~" u9 C- a" I
51 casualties reported ; C8 v0 k  |# ~1 T
Guns lost 2 9 u0 \1 @9 c( z! e- B
Vehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??- U! O: F# p; Y8 [3 {: |9 H/ b

& O1 b7 H# r+ l8 a' o' ~最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? & ?, v2 D% p3 d$ t0 c, b6 ~. `* m

9 l) |( t4 |3 _( p+ q
4 X: n( K2 v7 `0 C8 P! q: h# Z* uGround combat at Kuala
1 F& ~  y# f( S/ A0 `% u( s# d0 T- c! j4 t& w
Allied Shock attack
) V  C: I) V7 C- \' w* B* M4 x. ~, H. Q7 ~) A! Z* j
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2 - J9 c! a0 o0 x/ X
7 H' F/ t+ }8 {5 |! I1 l5 Q. }
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5 2 w# C; v; Y' T3 A3 u
7 d/ l' J  y0 c6 X) }" ^: F
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0 " d! D& I0 P$ X: K! Z1 N# ^& z7 |

3 h" |8 K1 Y$ p* D8 _( RJapanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1 0 T5 z1 D  G7 J8 k
- ]$ J: P& @  A$ \6 M* I" f
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)
; v9 W# Q1 s6 a/ k3 z! g: E
' I: s6 J3 a2 Y" z$ M' `9 C9 k) ?4 f  DAllied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!! . d5 H  a, C5 p" Y+ _, a& a

4 u) `) _" D$ C+ i+ d& E
" L* c4 r! p6 |) D# W% j; aAllied ground losses:
' a+ [, i  g" d/ u" C2 c6 F: \24 casualties reported
% X3 _# |/ O- s9 DGuns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表& W) G: v- ^" y# ~4 G+ e- `
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
1 Y# S9 c+ p( d$ K8 d5 R1 n6 X: A$ \; z5 }, r* e8 [& ~9 u
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
+ N2 E1 e! ^/ @9 ?
8 V2 T9 }8 }: z. D, A
- m/ A. F) I% x2 P: OGround combat at Kuala 4 ^& Y/ J# I1 S4 h7 N- d: M5 j' O

3 s) f' L: g2 K8 I+ S7 AAllied Shock attack 0 A# [2 q$ B7 K' t5 P$ F( F
6 h( i1 U, C2 g
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
/ [. ]8 _- F* L0 T) U" W/ d  k8 ?% N- m

- c# G$ x0 _5 a( M3 V. d
3 J9 v3 {6 H1 E: ^* z这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙??
这四个明显是逃兵啊,死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄
一万年太久,只争朝夕!

回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊,这怎么可能!
估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。
这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...
死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了,但0:1的比分就不能理解了
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表" M) l9 b3 b1 X- J
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
% @5 a% O  ], _# o  x- c( `  i! @
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
) w( C: C' y7 Y5 L
" \; ]/ i8 o7 u: a2 Y; f) \: w, x' `" G% P
Ground combat at Kuala
; A9 Z, c2 d" B" `! ]- ^& Z( p) v+ r6 W  s3 p
Allied Shock attack # X0 r' o% t6 q7 y1 j$ \
: P' t+ |6 R8 n3 U) D
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
$ c% U. p& R$ p* }
: |6 a2 a2 N1 e- t) }' w所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈!
那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.
返回列表