返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 9 z+ O  O& n$ s/ e! Y
4 @* U" p' h9 {) {
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE+ r6 s1 d" F5 u$ V7 V; [: F5 B& t
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
+ F6 f9 z: [, a, r& `6 arange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with. J& b$ T% i7 z4 s; q
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
3 d% ]. }9 E* ]) D3 w3 f) A7 I2 xGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but: v8 v6 i' F- n" o1 s
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will. @9 |2 m: f9 M6 V( f: m
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
: N. ~6 s0 R( [+ @0 rand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
5 ?+ D( }6 t. Q' Pplanning operations that require such high risk., b* s# l5 V* o$ H
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
, x* Y5 Q) L+ B* X9 W
8 Q# h3 B; N& A5 \中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
5 ?- j9 x1 c# t" P0 h扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表