返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 5 g: A9 d5 @" ?) q0 ^
" i+ s6 ?' k# r+ S3 G& ^' Y
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
; {# E8 Q/ p) [The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended; Y  c2 M+ |9 r' y- {
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with. X3 A& R; ^& T0 Q8 q
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of/ H/ E4 r1 i2 V5 E9 p: a* r
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but, t' W; t' u6 i. l/ j* s
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will5 o9 J/ |0 S5 z6 A) E& C& _4 h( q% d/ P
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
% y6 z# t) X8 k. _6 Nand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when! Q; l3 E: C# b' _& R$ B, F( Y
planning operations that require such high risk.
1 N/ G( ^' e: S* l' i. s谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 2 o+ {7 r) O' \3 q4 ?
. }. w" N9 B" {2 M- W
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
7 j% e& F1 l8 j* R; e. j6 b7 }( n扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表